Is Graffiti An Art Or Crime Essay

While I thought the matter had been settled by better people than I, a friend just asked me about graffiti, thus obligating me to write up a bit about it.

In regards to the question of whether or not graffiti is art, my stock response is to ask “is painting art?” This response is not intended to be flippant, rather it indicates my actual view on the matter which is a serious philosophical position.

Contemporary graffiti is, by its nature, a form of painting. After all, the person creating the graffiti (typically) uses the methods and material of painting (although the paint is typically spray paint). As such, specific examples of graffiti would be assessed as art or not art by the same standards by which a painting would be assessed. For example, a crude tagging involving a person spray painting his/her name on the hood of your car would no more be art than it would be for a person to sign his/her name on a canvas using a brush. As another example, if the ghost of da Vinci manifested and grabbed spray paint to create a work on par with Mona Lisa masterfully on the side of a business, then that would have the same status as the Mona Lisa, at least in terms of being art or not. Thus, given that graffiti is essentially painting it follows that it is as much art as painting is or is not. In fact, given that graffiti involves the very same techniques and mediums as “conventional” painting, the burden of proof would seem to be on those who would deny that graffiti is (or more accurately, can be) art while maintaining that painting is art.

One common objection is that graffiti is not art because it is vandalism and hence a criminal act. While it is true that it can be vandalism and a criminal act, these facts would not seem to have a bearing on its status of being art. The mere fact that something is illegal or classified as vandalism hardly seems sufficient to make something fall outside of the realm of art. After all, imagine a state in which music was a criminal act and labeled as a vandalism of the public sound space. It would hardly follow that music would thus cease to be art. As such, this objection fails.

Another common objection is that graffiti is crude or simplistic and hence cannot be considered art. The obvious reply, to steal from Aristotle, is that not all graffiti is to be condemned, just that which is crude or simplistic. After all, music would not be considered non-art simply because some musicians create crude or simplistic music. The same should hold for graffiti as well.

Thus, graffiti is as much art as painting is or is not.

[ cialis transdermal | buy cialis online | viagra effects on the penis | buy discount viagra | generic pack viagra | brand viagra | discount phentermine viagra | viagra suppliers | pfizer viagra | cialis no rx | order viagra now | can young men take viagra | viagra suppliers | herbal alternative to cialis | cialis canadian | how to get viagra | effects alcohol viagra | viagra price list | viagra pill for women | viagra tablets | cialis okay for women | buy viagra in canada | buy cheap purchase uk viagra | women use viagra | order viagra now | viagra without a prescription | cialis soft tablets | effects alcohol viagra | china viagra | viagra produced in mexico | alternative drug new viagra | gnc viagra | discount cialis | overnight viagra | 50 mg viagra | viagra canada | viagra u.k | viagra experiences | viagra en gel | herbal vigor | cialis tablets | double dose of cialis | online doctor viagra | canadian viagra | viagra online uk | how to make viagra | can viagra be used by women | viagra canada generic | cialis endurance | viagra movies | viagra in india | generic cialis next day delivery | discount cialis levitra viagra | viagra pfizer 50 mg ]

Not art.

PhilosophyAerosol paint, aristotle, Graffiti, Mona Lisa, Paint, Spray painting, Subcultures, Vandalism

Essay about Graffiti is a Beautiful Crime

1307 Words6 Pages

Graffiti is a Beautiful Crime

Graffiti is a form of art that people use to express themselves and to convey various messages to people in a particular community. In the movie "Graffiti Verite':. One of the graffiti artist explained that his purpose in doing graffiti is that it allows him to "express his anger' on the wall. Another kid by the name of "Jipsie" said that graffiti is a "form of growth". There were several different explanations that artists shared as well as several different reasons why they like graffiti. The common theme among the graffiti artist and taggers was that graffiti is simply a form of self-expression (Bryan). At the end of the film one tagger made a comment and said, "graffiti is not vandalism, but it is a…show more content…

The Barry Ringer Show which was held in class was a very insightful experience because it allowed a police officer, a property owner, a tagger and a graffiti artist to come together and talk about their different points of view. To die, a tagger representing TCP crew, made some very important points about needing to establish "a sense of identity" as well as a very strong need to be "known" and "accepted" in his crew. While I can certainly understand graffiti is a way in which ~taggers express themselves, the fact is that it is against the law to do this on other peoples property!

Graffiti is considered vandalism when tagger's violate the laws, and violate what is not theirs. Vandalism, destruction of property, is a misdemeanor in most cases. A misdemeanor is a crime which is punishable by one year in the county jail and/or a fine. The California penal code (which consists of California laws and penalties) has several penal code sections specific to graffiti violations. The penal code Notation description is as follows. Any person who maliciously commits any of the following acts with respect to any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than those specified by state law, is guilty of vandalism; such acts include defaces with graffiti;, (or other scribed material), damage to property, or destruction of property. Property consists of vehicles, public signs, fixtures, or furnishings belonging to any public entity. Obviously, the

Show More

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *